As technology advances and time passes more and more manufacturers will join this ecosystem.The concept of 'equivalence *1' is still somewhat controversial and not always clearly understood. The ecosystem around M4/3 has already gone well beyond critical mass and it has become far too large to be abandoned. A new cinematic camera system that has already become a legend, the Blackmagic, is also based on M4/3. Sony has just released a 20 MP M4/3 sensor. Voigtländer makes a series of their legendary Nokton photography lenses for M4/3 that cost 800-1000 USD each. Zeiss even makes cinematic lenses for M4/3 that cost 4.000-10.000 USD each. There are more and more manufacturers now committing to M4/3. The technology doesn’t stand still and miniaturisation has been going on ever since photography was invented. It is far more likely that eventually M4/3 and medium format will be the only ones remaining. Full frame is most at risk of becoming an abandoned technology, followed by APS-C. It is a silly myth that APS-C or even full frame is somehow safe from being abandoned while M4/3 is at risk of being abandoned. They also tend to offer higher resolutions due to their increased size. In general, a physically larger sensor will have larger pixels for the same resolution, meaning APS-C sensors are better for image quality. So ideally you want a camera with both a large resolution and a large pixel size. That means that the larger the individual pixels on a sensor, the better for low light performance, for reducing noise and for increased dynamic range. Simply put, the larger the resolution, the better the image detail a camera can record, but this also applies to pixel size. Pixel size is not fixed, with some models of camera having larger or smaller pixels even within the same camera format due to differing resolutions, but in general, APS-C cameras tend to have smaller pixels in their most recent models, due to sensor innovation.įor example, the Canon M6 Mark II, an APS-C camera, has a pixel size of 3.20µm from a 32.5 megapixel resolution, while the Olympus OM-D E-M1, a micro 4/3 camera, has a pixel size of 3.72µm from a 16.3 megapixel resolution. Resolution of a camera is measured in pixels, with each of the pixels seen in your photo file corresponding to a physical pixel on the sensor. Therefore, comparing micro 4/3 vs 4/3, the sensor size is the same, but there is no longer any space left between the lens mount and the sensor for this mirror or pentaprism, meaning that cameras using micro 4/3 can be made much smaller and can fit a much wider range of lenses, even from third-party manufacturers with the necessary adapters. This 4/3 system needed space for the reflex mirror of the DSLR, which is not present in mirrorless cameras. You might have heard of the four thirds system (without the micro in front), which is an older system from Olympus, originally designed for DSLRs. Standard DSLRs and cameras that use 35mm film have a 3:2 aspect ratio, so comparing the micro four thirds vs APS-C cameras, the micro four thirds cameras are better suited for making prints at standard medium format sizes like 6 x 4.5 inches. The micro four thirds sensor size is 17.3 mm wide × 13.0 mm high (21.6 mm on the diagonal), which is comparable to the 110 cartridge film developed by Kodak.Ī micro 4/3 sensor gets its name because this width and height is in the 4:3 aspect ratio, which is the standard medium format ratio. The first micro 4/3 cameras were only released in 2008, from a standard developed by Olympus and Panasonic for their iterations of mirrorless cameras.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |